If there's one thing that Christians will undoubtedly drum into your ear, and that will be Jesus is the son of God. Christians have this pre programmed mentality that whatever you do don't forget to preach that Jesus is the son of God. Now this has always been the case when Muslims and Christians debate a debate will not be complete until the son of God is not mentioned!
But the question is was Jesus of the bible really the son of God? To answer this we have to go back to the beginning of the bible, The very first book Genesis and take it from there.
Nearly All Christians with an exception of a few ( I.e handful) have an incorrect understanding of the story where Eve was tempted by the serpent!. Unlike Jews Christians tend to use there own interpretation of the bible and that's how they get it all wrong. The biblical account of the story where eve gets tempted by the serpent has a twist which Christians are unaware of. We all know that Adam and Eve were tempted into eating the fruit which took them out of the garden of Eden, but what happend before them eating the fruit will shock you!.
Now the serpent was cunning, more than all the beasts of the field that the Lord God had made, and it said to the woman, "Did God indeed say, 'You shall not eat of any of the trees of the garden?'" (Genesis 3:1)
Now the serpent was cunning: What is the connection of this matter here? Scripture should have juxtaposed (below verse 21): “And He made for Adam and for his wife shirts of skin, and He dressed them.” But it teaches you as a result of what plan the serpent thrust himself upon them. He saw them naked and engaging in intercourse before everyone’s eyes, and he desired her. — [from Gen. Rabbah 18:6]
And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat. (Genesis 3:13)
Focus on verse 13. The key word here is "beguiled" and for this we look into the Hebrew meaning. :
beguiled = Hebrew word # 5377 nasha' (naw-shaw');a primitive root; to lead astray, i.e. (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce: to beguile, to deceive utterly (infinitive).
We find that this same idea is used in the New Testament Greek.
But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. (2 Corinthians 11:3)
serpent = Greek word # 3789 ophis (of'-is); probably from 3700 (through the idea of sharpness of vision); a snake, figuratively (as a type of sly cunning) an artful malicious person
beguiled = Greek word #1818 "exapatao" (ex-ap-at-ah'-o); To seduce wholly.
Bingo. Further confirmation that this was indeed a sexual act. There is only one single meaning of the Greek "exapatao" and it's quite clear.
not as Cain, who was of the evil one and slew his brother And for what reason did he slay him? Because his deeds were evil, and his brother's were righteous. (1 John 3:12)
The Greek expression translated "of the evil one" is ek poneros. The preposition ek denotes origin. It governs the genitive. The word poneros is clearly not referring to Adam or Adam's Creator. So, does this verse represent the kind of conclusive evidence we're seeking? If it does, it's not readily apparent. Due to the context of the verse, verse 8 even by itself seems to discount verse 12, declaring that "the one who practices sin is of the devil." (ek diabolos)
And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel." (Genesis 3:15)
In reply Genesis 3:15 Yahweh says to Satan, "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed". The same word zehra was used for both the seed of Satan and the seed of Eve. Zehra literally means seed; there is no other meaning. It also could be used as grains of wheat but it is used throughout the Bible as meaning the descendants of a person. Satan was to have just as literal children in this world as Eve was to have. The same word zehra is used for Satan's seed and Eve's seed.
Just incase our Christian fiends bring up this verse from the bible to support that Cain was Adams son :
And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. 2 And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. (Genesis 4:1-2)
Honestly, we can only say that one or more of them was Adam's, based strictly on this passage. there's a clue we should note before we move on. Upon delivering Cain, Eve declared that she had gotten a man with (Hebrew - 'eth) the Lord (Hebrew - Yehovah). If you research the name reference that is the Hebrew word Yehovah in all the surrounding context you find an interesting feature. Prior to Eve's declaration in Genesis 4:1 the word Yehovah is always followed by the word 'elohiym, forming "Lord God" - without exception. Eve's declaration marks a change. Why? Did she profane the name with reference to a lesser god? Well, that's something to think about.
Looking for way out of this wouldn't help Christians as the evidence provided above are sufficient to prove our point. Now that's we've given hard evidence that Satan sexually deceived eve of the bible, let's introduce something else to this paper that's will really tick Christians off.......
According to the bible the genealogy of Jesus has the bloodline of Cain who is the son of Satan? Which means Jesus of the bible is from the line of Satan!. Let's provide evidence from the very bible Christians claim is the absolute word of God!.
the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham, the son of Terah, the son of N of Nahor, the son of Serug, the son of Reu, the son of Peleg, the son of Eber, the son of Shelah, the son of Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem, the son of Noah, the son of Lamech (Luke 3:34-36)
Did you catch the joke? Read Carefully the above genealogy of Jesus, amongst all the listed name we have one particular persons mentioned Cainan, the son of Arphaxad!..
Seriously Cainan??? how did Cainan creep into the genealogy of Jesus?. If Cain was the father of Cainan then this would suggest that the bloodline of Satan came all the way down to Jesus which opens up a new vans of worms!.
More evidence from the bible suggest this to be true. Jesus of the bible could not have been the son of God as found in the book of Hebrews :
In the same way, Christ did not take on himself the glory of becoming a high priest. But God said to him, "You are my Son; today I have become your Father." (Hebrews 5:5)
Notice how Yahweh is saying today I have become your Father. why today if he always was his father? There is also this understanding that the same was said after Jesus was baptised in a variant reading codex bezae codex D. Why would Yahweh say to his son who was always with him today I have become your Father? This means he wasn't his son all those time after he was baptized and cleansed he became his son is a metaphorical way not literal.
This is another blow on Christians that their so called saviôur is actually from the bloodline of Satan !!